home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: rover.ucs.ualberta.ca!alberta!cuts
- From: cuts@scapa.cs.ualberta.ca (Douglas Cuts)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.emulations
- Subject: Re: Q: Best graphic card for Emplant usage? One for sale perhaps?
- Date: 26 Jan 1996 02:49:48 GMT
- Organization: Computing Science, U of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
- Message-ID: <4e9fgc$h1q@scapa.cs.ualberta.ca>
- References: <valefar-2401960157350001@ppp25.pensacola.com> <1420.6597T232T2665@mindlink.bc.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cab019.cs.ualberta.ca
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Steve Wong (Steve_Wong@mindlink.bc.ca) wrote:
- : On 24-Jan-96 00:11:25, valefar wrote the following text about "Q: Best graphic
- : card for Emplant usage? One for sale perhaps?" (article <valefar-
- : 2401960157350001@ppp25.pensacola.com>) ...
- : > If one exists, what would be the _best_ graphic card to use with Emplant on
- : > this 3000, with a memory-happy Warp 040/40 in place? Obviously something
- : > Zorro III... but which one?
-
- : > I want the fastest, most reliable (i.e. stable) card that I can possibly get
- : > (I currently have the Picasso II).. for both the Emplant and Amiga sides
- : > of the world...
-
- : I can definitely vouch for the CyberVision 64 card: it's currently the fastest
- : Amiga card out there, and is ZIII compliant.
-
-
- Does the CV64 really speed up graphics significantly? I hear good results
- from EMPLANT users running the MAC side, but what about the PC module--do you
- know about the PC emulation, Steve, or you using it? If it will speed up
- the extremely slow graphics I'm seeing with mine then I'll get it...
- but if one can do without the higher resolutions, then maybe the Cyberstorm
- '060 is the best all-around buy for speed. I don't know, what do you think?
- --
- _-_ _-_
- / _\--/_ \ Doug Cuts
- <-t, O O .j-> cuts@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca
- / /()\ \
- i n__n i just look for the Red Dog
- i_/.__.\_j
-